Skip to main content

Perez v. Trans Union, LLC

E.D. Pa.November 27, 2007No. Civil Action 06-3357Cited 6 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Giles
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court granted Credco's motion for summary judgment in part and denied it in part. Trans Union was dismissed with prejudice via settlement. The case proceeded to trial on negligent violation claims but was dismissed on willful noncompliance claims.

What This Ruling Means

**Perez v. Trans Union, LLC: Mixed Court Ruling on Employment Claims** This case involved workplace disputes between an employee named Perez and two companies - Trans Union, LLC and First Advantage Credco, LLC. The specific details of what triggered the lawsuit aren't fully clear from the available information, but it involved employment law violations that the worker claimed were both negligent and willful. The court reached a mixed decision that favored different parties on different issues. Trans Union settled the case and was completely removed from the lawsuit. For First Advantage Credco, the court granted some of the company's requests to dismiss parts of the case, but allowed other claims to continue. Specifically, the case moved forward to trial on claims that the company negligently violated employment laws, but the court dismissed claims that the violations were intentional or willful. For workers, this case demonstrates that employment law disputes can be complex, with some claims succeeding while others fail. It shows that companies may face different consequences depending on whether their violations are found to be accidental mistakes versus deliberate wrongdoing. Workers should understand that proving intentional violations requires stronger evidence than showing negligent behavior.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.