Skip to main content

Audubon Insurance v. Terry Road Wine & Liquor, Inc.

S.D. Miss.February 14, 1995No. 3:94-cv-00333Cited 2 times
Mixed ResultTerry Road Wine and Liquor, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Barbour
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
720 Labor/Management Relations Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court granted in part and denied in part the summary judgment motions of all parties. Audubon Insurance has no duty to defend or indemnify Terry Road regarding bodily injury claims arising from the illegal sale of alcohol to a minor, but the court left unresolved whether coverage applies to loss of consortium and loss of household services claims.

What This Ruling Means

# Summary of Audubon Insurance v. Terry Road Wine & Liquor, Inc. **What Happened** Terry Road Wine and Liquor, Inc. sold alcohol to a minor, which resulted in bodily injury claims against the business. The company's insurance provider, Audubon Insurance, was asked to pay for the legal defense and any damages. Terry Road disputed whether their insurance policy should cover this situation. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled that Audubon Insurance does not have to defend or pay for claims related to bodily injuries caused by illegal alcohol sales to minors. However, the court left some questions unanswered about whether insurance should cover other types of losses, such as family members' loss of companionship or household services. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that businesses cannot rely on insurance to cover damages from illegal activities. When employers or their businesses break the law—in this case, selling alcohol to minors—insurance companies may refuse to pay. Workers at these businesses could face serious consequences if illegal practices lead to lawsuits and financial problems for their employer.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Similar Rulings

Elizabeth F. Smith v. First Union National Bank
1st CircuitJan 2000
Mixed Result
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
2nd CircuitSep 2014
Defendant Win
Irizarry v. Catsimatidis
2nd CircuitJul 2013
Mixed Result
Adkins
4th CircuitAug 2002
Defendant Win
R.I., Inc. v. New York State Department of Labor
N.Y. App. Div.Apr 2010
Defendant Win
Read Full OpinionMore Terry Road Wine and Liquor, Inc. RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from MississippiMore wage theft casesMore retail employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.