Skip to main content

Union Hill Homes Ass'n, Inc. v. RET DEVELOPMENT

Mo. Ct. App.August 27, 2002No. WD 60091Cited 28 times
Defendant WinUnion Hill Homes Association, Inc.$8,510.29 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Ellis, Smith, Howard
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The trial court found the homeowners association (appellant) in civil contempt for failing to comply with court orders to release restrictive covenants and issue a certificate of compliance. The association was ordered to pay damages and a per diem fine, and the appeal was dismissed as moot after the association purged itself of contempt by performing the required acts.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Hill Homes Association v. RET Development: Court Holds Employer Accountable for Ignoring Court Orders** This case involved Union Hill Homes Association, which failed to follow court orders requiring them to release certain property restrictions and provide required compliance certificates. The association repeatedly ignored these legal requirements, prompting the other party to ask the court to hold them in contempt. The court ruled against Union Hill Homes Association, finding them in civil contempt for refusing to comply with court orders. The association was ordered to pay $8,510.29 in damages plus daily fines until they followed through with what the court had originally required. Eventually, the association performed the required actions, which resolved the contempt issue and made their appeal unnecessary. This case matters for workers because it demonstrates that courts will enforce their orders and hold employers accountable when they try to ignore legal requirements. When employers refuse to comply with court rulings, they can face financial penalties that increase over time. This shows that the legal system has tools to pressure non-compliant employers into following court decisions, which can be important in employment disputes where workers need employers to actually follow through on court-ordered remedies.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.