Skip to main content

Ginsberg v. Neighborhood Development Collaborative

U.S. Supreme CourtJanuary 10, 2005No. 04-552
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
Circuit
Federal Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari, leaving the Fourth Circuit's decision affirmed without review of the merits.

What This Ruling Means

**Ginsberg v. Neighborhood Development Collaborative** This case involved an employment dispute between a worker named Ginsberg and their employer, the Neighborhood Development Collaborative. While the specific details of what sparked the disagreement aren't provided in the available information, it was an employment law matter that made its way through the court system. The case ultimately reached the Supreme Court, but the Court chose not to hear it. When the Supreme Court "denies certiorari," it means they declined to review the case. This left standing whatever decision the lower court (the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals) had made. The Supreme Court's refusal to hear the case was not a judgment on whether the worker was right or wrong - they simply chose not to review it. **What This Means for Workers:** This outcome shows how difficult it can be to get employment cases heard by the highest court in the land. The Supreme Court only reviews a small fraction of cases that come before it. When they decline to hear an employment case, it means workers must rely on lower court decisions, which can vary by region. This highlights the importance of building strong cases at the trial and appeals court level, since getting a second chance at the Supreme Court is unlikely.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.