Angell v. UNION FIRE DIST. OF S. KINGSTOWN
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Williams, Goldberg, Flaherty, Suttell, Robinson
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The Rhode Island Supreme Court reversed the summary judgment granted to the defendants, holding that the injured-on-duty statute does not apply to volunteer firefighters. The plaintiff is entitled to proceed with his negligence action against the Fire District.
What This Ruling Means
Volunteer Firefighter Wins Right to Sue for Workplace Injury
This case involved a volunteer firefighter who was injured while responding to a fire call for the Union Fire District of South Kingstown. The firefighter wanted to sue the fire district for negligence, claiming they failed to provide proper safety measures that led to his injury.
The fire district argued that a Rhode Island law called the "injured-on-duty statute" prevented the volunteer firefighter from suing them. This law typically protects employers from being sued by workers who get hurt on the job, requiring them to use workers' compensation instead.
The Rhode Island Supreme Court disagreed with the fire district and ruled in favor of the injured volunteer firefighter. The court decided that the injured-on-duty statute does not apply to volunteer firefighters, meaning they can still sue their fire districts for negligence when they get hurt.
Why this matters for workers: This ruling is significant for volunteer firefighters and other volunteer workers in Rhode Island. Unlike regular employees who must typically go through workers' compensation for workplace injuries, volunteers may have the right to file negligence lawsuits directly against the organizations they serve. This could potentially lead to better compensation for injuries than what workers' compensation typically provides.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
The plaintiff, Michael Crenshaw, appealed from a January 7, 2019 judgment entered in the Providence County Superior Court in favor of the defendants, the State of Rhode Island and Lieutenant Scott Raynes (State Defendants) and the Community College of Rhode Island, the Council on Postsecondary…
The plaintiff, John Ferreira, appealed from the dismissal of his first amended complaint against his former employer, Child and Family Services of Newport County. The plaintiff had asserted claims such as defamation constructive termination discrimination based on disparate treatment, age, and…
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.