Skip to main content

Laborers' Pension Fund v. Pavement Maintenance, Inc.

7th CircuitAugust 29, 2008No. 06-1955, 06-2357Cited 21 times
Plaintiff WinPavement Maintenance, Inc.$242,647.75 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Ripple, Manion, Wood
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment in favor of the Funds and MB Financial, finding that MAT Leasing owed $242,647.75 to PMI and ordering payment to the priority creditor MB Financial.

What This Ruling Means

**Laborers' Pension Fund v. Pavement Maintenance, Inc.** This case involved a dispute over unpaid pension fund contributions. Pavement Maintenance, Inc. (PMI) failed to make required payments to the Laborers' Pension Fund, which manages retirement benefits for union workers. The pension fund sued to collect the missing contributions that should have been paid on behalf of PMI's employees. The court ruled in favor of the pension fund and ordered that $242,647.75 be paid to cover the unpaid contributions. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld this decision, confirming that the employer owed this substantial amount for failing to meet its pension obligations to workers. This ruling matters for workers because it demonstrates that courts will enforce employers' legal duty to make pension contributions. When companies fail to pay into employee pension funds, workers' retirement security is at risk. The decision shows that pension funds can successfully sue employers who don't meet their contribution obligations, helping protect workers' future benefits. It also serves as a warning to employers that they cannot simply skip pension payments without facing legal consequences and having to pay the full amount owed plus potential additional costs.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.