Skip to main content

HTH Companies v. Mo. Dept. of Labor & Industrial Relations

Mo. Ct. App.September 21, 2004No. ED 84234Cited 1 time
Defendant WinHTH Companies, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Sherri B. Sullivan
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's determination that the prevailing wage rate for asbestos workers in Boone and Cole Counties should be $37.15 per hour, rejecting the employers' challenges that apprentice hours should have been included in the wage calculation.

What This Ruling Means

# HTH Companies v. Missouri Department of Labor & Industrial Relations **What Happened** HTH Companies challenged a government wage determination for asbestos workers in Boone and Cole Counties. The company argued that the prevailing wage rate of $37.15 per hour should be lower because apprentice work hours should have been included in the wage calculation. **What the Court Decided** Missouri's appellate court sided with the Department of Labor. The court upheld the $37.15 hourly wage rate and rejected the company's argument about including apprentice hours in the calculation. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling protects prevailing wage standards—the minimum wages required on certain projects. By rejecting the employer's attempt to lower the wage calculation, the court ensured that asbestos workers in these counties maintained their established pay rate. This case demonstrates that courts will defend prevailing wage protections against employer efforts to reduce them. For workers in similar industries, it affirms that wage calculations must properly account for skilled labor standards, not be artificially lowered through apprentice hour averaging.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Hth from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.