Skip to main content

Sandra Cortez v. Trans Union

3rd CircuitAugust 13, 2010No. 08-2465, 08-2466Cited 385 times
Plaintiff WinTrans Union, LLC$150,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
McKee, Hardiman, Van Antwerpen
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to Accommodate

Outcome

The Third Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Trans Union's motion for judgment as a matter of law and affirmed the jury's compensatory damages award of $50,000. The court also affirmed the remittitur of punitive damages from $750,000 to $100,000.

What This Ruling Means

**Sandra Cortez v. Trans Union: Court Rules in Favor of Worker in Disability Accommodation Case** Sandra Cortez sued her employer, Trans Union LLC, claiming the company failed to provide reasonable accommodations for her disability. The dispute centered on Trans Union's refusal to make necessary workplace adjustments that would have allowed Cortez to perform her job duties effectively. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Cortez's favor, upholding a jury's decision that Trans Union violated disability accommodation laws. The court confirmed that Cortez should receive $50,000 in compensatory damages for the harm she suffered. Additionally, the jury had originally awarded $750,000 in punitive damages to punish the company's conduct, but the court reduced this amount to $100,000, bringing her total award to $150,000. This case is important for workers because it reinforces that employers must take disability accommodation requests seriously and make reasonable efforts to help employees with disabilities do their jobs. When companies fail to provide proper accommodations, they can face significant financial penalties. Workers with disabilities have legal protections and can successfully challenge employers who don't meet their accommodation obligations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Similar Rulings

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
People in re S.L. and A.L
COLOCTAPPDec 2017

The Rio Blanco County Department of Human Services (Department) became involved with the parents in this case as a result of concerns about the children's welfare due to the condition of the family home, the parents' use of methamphetamine, and criminal cases involving the parents. Attempts at voluntary services failed, and on the Department's petition for dependency and neglect, the district court ultimately terminated the parents' rights. On appeal, the parents contended that the Department failed to make reasonable efforts to reunify them with their children. Specifically, the parents contended that the Department did not give them sufficient time to complete the services under their treatment plans and failed to accommodate their drug testing needs. The termination hearing was not held until more than a year after the motion to terminate was filed. For nine months before the motion to terminate was filed, the Department provided numerous services to the parents, including substance abuse therapy, therapeutic visitation supervision, drug abuse monitoring, and a parental capacity evaluation. The Department also provided counseling for the children. Both parents missed drug tests and tested positive during the testing period, and both were arrested for possession of methamphetamine during the pendency of the case. The Department made reasonable accommodations to meet the parents' needs and the parents had sufficient time to comply with their treatment plans. The record supports the trial court's findings that termination was appropriate because (1) the court-approved appropriate treatment plan had not been complied with by the parents or had not been successful in rehabilitating them (2) the parents were unfit and (3) the conduct or condition of the parents was unlikely to change within a reasonable time. Father also contended that the trial court's decision to interview the 9-year-old twin children together in chambers fundamentally and seriously affected the basi

Defendant Win
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Plaintiff Win
James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health Lab
9th CircuitNov 2000
Mixed Result
Wright
10th CircuitAug 2001
Defendant Win

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.