Skip to main content

Molovinsky v. Fair Employment Council of Greater Washington, Inc.

Md. Ct. Spec. App.December 22, 2003No. 949, Sept. Term, 2002Cited 6 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Hollander, Salmon, Barbera
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment awarding the Fair Employment Council $152,628.78 in attorneys' fees and costs, rejecting the Molovinskys' arguments that the trust termination constituted a fraudulent conveyance and various equitable defenses.

What This Ruling Means

**The Dispute** The Molovinsky family was involved in an employment-related legal battle with the Fair Employment Council of Greater Washington, Inc., a nonprofit organization that helps workers fight job discrimination. The case involved claims about employment law violations, and at some point during the legal proceedings, the Molovinskys argued that the Fair Employment Council had improperly transferred or hidden assets through a trust termination to avoid paying what they might owe. **The Court's Decision** The court ruled in favor of the Fair Employment Council. The appellate court upheld a lower court's decision to award the organization $152,628.78 in attorneys' fees and costs. The court rejected the Molovinskys' claims that the Council had engaged in fraudulent asset transfers and dismissed their other legal defenses. **What This Means for Workers** This case shows that when workers or employers lose employment lawsuits, they may be required to pay the winning side's legal expenses, which can be substantial. It also demonstrates that organizations like Fair Employment Councils, which typically help workers, can sometimes find themselves on the opposite side of employment disputes. Workers should understand that employment litigation can result in significant financial consequences beyond just the original claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.