Skip to main content

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Red Arrow Corporation

E.D. Mo.August 20, 1974No. 73 C 578(3)Cited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Wangelin
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

Defendant's motion to dismiss was denied and the case will proceed, but the court excluded all evidence derived from the EEOC's unauthorized newspaper advertisement naming the defendant and describing the discrimination allegations.

What This Ruling Means

# EEOC v. Red Arrow Corporation (1974) – Plain English Summary ## What Happened The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), a federal agency that protects workers from discrimination, filed a discrimination case against Red Arrow Corporation. The EEOC had published a newspaper advertisement naming the company and describing the discrimination complaints. Red Arrow asked the court to throw out the entire case. ## What the Court Decided The court rejected Red Arrow's request to dismiss the case, allowing it to move forward. However, the court ruled that any evidence coming from the unauthorized newspaper advertisement—including information the EEOC had publicly shared—could not be used in the lawsuit. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case shows that workers cannot simply rely on public announcements of their complaints. While the EEOC can pursue discrimination cases, the agency must follow proper procedures in how it handles information. Workers filing discrimination complaints should understand that how their case is handled—including what gets published publicly—can significantly affect whether evidence will be allowed in court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.