Skip to main content

Erickson v. Labor and Industry Review Commission

WISCTAPPAugust 3, 2005No. 2004AP3237Cited 1 time
Defendant WinQuad/Graphics, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Brown, Nettesheim, Snyder
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationFailure to Accommodate

Outcome

The court affirmed LIRC's decision dismissing Erickson's disability discrimination complaint, finding he failed to establish that he had a disability within the meaning of the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act because he did not present competent medical evidence of a permanent physical impairment.

What This Ruling Means

# Erickson v. Labor and Industry Review Commission ## What Happened Erickson filed a discrimination complaint against his employer, Quad/Graphics, Inc., claiming he was treated unfairly because of a disability. He also argued the company failed to accommodate his condition as required by law. ## What the Court Decided The court sided with the employer. It found that Erickson did not prove he actually had a disability under Wisconsin's Fair Employment Act. Specifically, he did not provide proper medical evidence showing he had a permanent physical impairment. Without establishing this basic fact, his discrimination and accommodation claims could not succeed. The court upheld an earlier decision dismissing his complaint entirely, and he received no damages. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case shows that workers pursuing disability discrimination claims must have solid medical documentation. Simply claiming a disability without credible medical evidence is not enough to move a case forward. Workers facing discrimination should gather comprehensive medical records and expert opinions before filing complaints to strengthen their legal position.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Similar Rulings

Diment
N.D. Ill.Jan 2024
Defendant Win
Vega
2nd CircuitSep 2015
Remanded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1941
Plaintiff Win
People in re S.L. and A.L
COLOCTAPPDec 2017

The Rio Blanco County Department of Human Services (Department) became involved with the parents in this case as a result of concerns about the children's welfare due to the condition of the family home, the parents' use of methamphetamine, and criminal cases involving the parents. Attempts at voluntary services failed, and on the Department's petition for dependency and neglect, the district court ultimately terminated the parents' rights. On appeal, the parents contended that the Department failed to make reasonable efforts to reunify them with their children. Specifically, the parents contended that the Department did not give them sufficient time to complete the services under their treatment plans and failed to accommodate their drug testing needs. The termination hearing was not held until more than a year after the motion to terminate was filed. For nine months before the motion to terminate was filed, the Department provided numerous services to the parents, including substance abuse therapy, therapeutic visitation supervision, drug abuse monitoring, and a parental capacity evaluation. The Department also provided counseling for the children. Both parents missed drug tests and tested positive during the testing period, and both were arrested for possession of methamphetamine during the pendency of the case. The Department made reasonable accommodations to meet the parents' needs and the parents had sufficient time to comply with their treatment plans. The record supports the trial court's findings that termination was appropriate because (1) the court-approved appropriate treatment plan had not been complied with by the parents or had not been successful in rehabilitating them (2) the parents were unfit and (3) the conduct or condition of the parents was unlikely to change within a reasonable time. Father also contended that the trial court's decision to interview the 9-year-old twin children together in chambers fundamentally and seriously affected the basi

Defendant Win

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.