Skip to main content

Crigger v. Division of Employment Security

Mo. Ct. App.June 9, 2009No. WD 70205Cited 1 time
Defendant WinCaterpillar, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Welsh, Howard, Ahuja
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's decision disqualifying the appellant from unemployment benefits, finding that his employer Caterpillar, Inc. properly discharged him for misconduct.

What This Ruling Means

# Crigger v. Division of Employment Security **What Happened** A worker named Crigger was fired from Caterpillar, Inc. and applied for unemployment benefits. The Division of Employment Security rejected his claim, saying he was fired for misconduct. Crigger appealed this decision, arguing he should receive the benefits anyway. **What the Court Decided** The court agreed with the Division of Employment Security and Caterpillar. The judge upheld the decision to deny Crigger unemployment benefits, finding that the employer had valid reasons to fire him for misconduct. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling clarifies that employees fired for misconduct typically cannot collect unemployment benefits. "Misconduct" is serious—it means intentional wrongdoing or repeated violations of workplace rules, not simply poor performance. Workers who lose jobs through no fault of their own (like layoffs) usually qualify for benefits. However, workers terminated for rule-breaking or intentional misbehavior may not be eligible. If you're fired and denied benefits, you have the right to appeal, but you'll need to show the employer acted unfairly.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.