Skip to main content

Wado v. Xerox Corp.

W.D.N.Y.January 16, 1998No. 6:95-cv-06096Cited 30 times
Defendant WinXerox Corporation
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Larimer
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The court granted Xerox's motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs' disparate impact claims under the ADEA and Title VII, finding that the expert statistical analysis was fatally flawed for failing to account for legitimate nondiscriminatory factors such as performance ratings, and that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination.

What This Ruling Means

**Wado v. Xerox Corp. - Employment Discrimination Case** This case involved an employee named Wado who worked for Xerox Corporation and filed a discrimination lawsuit against the company. Wado claimed that Xerox discriminated against them in the workplace, though the specific details of the alleged discrimination are not provided in the available court records. The court dismissed Wado's case, meaning the judge threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money or other remedies to the employee. When a court dismisses a case, it typically means either the employee failed to prove their claims, the lawsuit was filed incorrectly, or there were procedural problems that prevented the case from moving forward. **What This Means for Workers:** This case serves as a reminder that winning discrimination lawsuits can be challenging. Workers who believe they face workplace discrimination should document incidents carefully, follow their company's complaint procedures when appropriate, and consider consulting with employment attorneys early in the process. Simply filing a discrimination claim doesn't guarantee success - employees need strong evidence and must follow proper legal procedures. While this particular case was unsuccessful, workers still have important rights under employment discrimination laws and shouldn't be discouraged from pursuing legitimate claims with proper preparation and legal guidance.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.