Skip to main content

Estate of Szleszinski Ex Rel. Szleszinski v. Labor & Industry Review Commission

WISCTAPPSeptember 27, 2005No. 2004AP3033Cited 3 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Cane, Hoover, Peterson
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationWrongful Termination

Outcome

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals reversed LIRC's decision and reinstated the ALJ's ruling that Midwest Coast Transport wrongfully discriminated against Szleszinski based on his disability (Wilson's disease), remanding for calculation of attorney fees and costs.

What This Ruling Means

# Court Rules for Worker in Disability Discrimination Case **What Happened** Szleszinski worked for Midwest Coast Transport and was fired from his job. He claimed the company discriminated against him because of a disability. The company argued that safety concerns justified the termination. When Szleszinski appealed to a labor agency called LIRC, the agency initially sided with the employer. **The Court's Decision** Wisconsin's appellate court disagreed with LIRC and ruled in Szleszinski's favor. The court found that Midwest Coast Transport did discriminate against him based on his disability. The court also rejected the employer's safety defense, meaning the company's safety argument was not valid enough to justify firing him. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case sends an important message: employers cannot simply claim "safety concerns" to fire workers with disabilities without proper investigation and documentation. Companies must explore reasonable alternatives to termination. Workers with disabilities have legal protections, and courts will examine whether discrimination actually occurred—not just accept an employer's stated reasons at face value.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.