Skip to main content

Employee Benefits Committee v. Tabor (In Re Cress)

S.D. Ind.May 9, 1991No. TH 90-211-C, Bankruptcy No. TH 89-1441, Adv. No. 90-8009Cited 5 times
Defendant WinEli Lilly and Co.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
McKINNEY
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Indiana

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court's decision that a qualified employee benefit plan with hardship withdrawal provisions is part of the bankruptcy estate, rejecting the argument that ERISA anti-alienation clauses qualify as 'applicable nonbankruptcy law' under Bankruptcy Code § 541(c)(2).

What This Ruling Means

**Employee Retirement Benefits in Bankruptcy** This case involved whether an employee's retirement plan money could be taken by creditors during bankruptcy proceedings. The employee (Cress) had a qualified retirement benefit plan through Eli Lilly and Co. that allowed hardship withdrawals. When Cress filed for bankruptcy, the question arose whether this retirement money was protected from creditors or could be seized to pay debts. The court ruled that the retirement plan assets were part of the bankruptcy estate, meaning creditors could potentially access them. The court rejected the argument that federal employment law (ERISA) protections against taking retirement money should override bankruptcy law in this situation. **What This Means for Workers:** This decision is concerning for employees because it suggests that certain types of employer-sponsored retirement plans may not be fully protected if you file for bankruptcy. Workers should understand that retirement savings might be at risk during financial hardship, even though these plans are generally protected from creditors in other situations. If you're facing financial difficulties, it's important to understand how bankruptcy could affect your retirement benefits and consider all options before filing.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.