Skip to main content

R.M. Taylor, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau (In Re R.M. Taylor, Inc.)

MOWBFebruary 11, 2000No. 19-40615Cited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Arthur B. Federman
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
bench trial

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court found that transfers totaling $100,000 made on January 14 and February 14, 1997 were in the ordinary course of business and excepted from avoidance, but transfers totaling $146,359 made on February 17 and February 21, 1997 were preferential transfers and will be avoided.

What This Ruling Means

# Court Ruling Summary: R.M. Taylor, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau ## What Happened R.M. Taylor, Inc. faced a bankruptcy dispute involving money transfers made to Employers Insurance of Wausau. The company made four separate transfers totaling over $246,000 in early 1997. The question was whether these payments should be returned to the bankrupt company's assets. ## What the Court Decided The court split its decision. Two transfers worth $100,000 were allowed to stand because they were normal business payments made in the regular course of operations. However, the court ruled that two other transfers totaling $146,359 were "preferential transfers"—payments made to benefit one creditor over others just before bankruptcy. The court ordered these transfers to be returned and recovered for the bankrupt estate. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case shows how bankruptcy courts protect workers and other creditors. When companies make special payments to certain creditors right before going bankrupt, courts can reverse those payments. This helps ensure all creditors—including employees owed wages—get treated fairly during bankruptcy proceedings rather than some creditors receiving preferential treatment.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.