Olick v. Kearney (In Re Olick)
Case Details
- Citation
- 422 B.R. 507, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 4048, 2009 WL 5214583
- Judge(s)
- Eric L. Frank
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- Post-trial decision after consolidated adversary proceedings
- State
- Pennsylvania
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The court found that the Knights violated COBRA and retaliated against Olick under ADEA, but did not discriminate based on age or violate ERISA. Olick is entitled to statutory damages for the violations.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.