Skip to main content

People Ex Rel. Department of Labor v. Sackville Construction, Inc.

Ill. App. Ct.June 9, 2010No. 3-09-0006Cited 12 times
Plaintiff WinSackville Construction, Inc.$19,189.39 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Lytton
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Illinois Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Sackville Construction and remanded the case, holding that the prevailing wage act applied to the project and that lack of notice to the subcontractor was not a valid defense.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Rules Construction Company Must Pay Proper Wages** The Illinois Department of Labor sued Sackville Construction for failing to pay workers the required prevailing wages on a public construction project. Prevailing wage laws require contractors working on government-funded projects to pay workers at least the standard wage rates for their area and trade. Sackville Construction argued they didn't have to follow these wage requirements and that they weren't properly notified about the prevailing wage rules. The Illinois Court of Appeals disagreed with Sackville Construction and ruled in favor of the Department of Labor. The court determined that the prevailing wage law did apply to this project and that the company couldn't avoid paying proper wages by claiming they didn't know about the requirements. The case was sent back to a lower court for further proceedings, and Sackville Construction was ordered to pay $19,189.39 in damages. This decision matters for workers because it reinforces that companies working on public projects must pay prevailing wages regardless of whether they claim ignorance of the law. It shows that workers have legal protections when employers try to shortchange them on government-funded construction jobs, and that courts will hold companies accountable for wage violations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.