Skip to main content

UTLX Manufacturing, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development

Ind. Ct. App.May 20, 2009No. 93A02-0810-EX-895Cited 3 times
Defendant WinUTLX Manufacturing, Inc.$764,773.14 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Riley, Kirsch, Mathias
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the Liability Administrative Law Judge's decision that UTLX was a successor employer of Union Tank, not a new employer, and therefore must pay the higher unemployment contribution rate (5.6% vs. 2.7%) retroactively with interest and penalties (penalties ultimately waived).

What This Ruling Means

# UTLX Manufacturing v. Indiana Department of Workforce Development **What Happened** UTLX Manufacturing took over operations from Union Tank. The company argued it was a brand-new employer and should pay the lower unemployment insurance contribution rate. Indiana's tax system charges new employers a lower rate (2.7%) while established employers pay more (5.6%) because they have a history of laying off workers. **What the Court Decided** The Indiana Court of Appeals ruled against UTLX. The court found that UTLX was actually the successor to Union Tank's business, not a new company. Therefore, UTLX had to pay the higher unemployment contribution rate going back to when it took over. The company owed approximately $764,773 in back payments, interest, and penalties. **Why This Matters for Workers** This decision protects the unemployment insurance system. It prevents companies from avoiding higher contribution rates by simply changing their name or structure while continuing the same operations. When employers pay appropriate unemployment taxes based on their actual history, there's more money available for workers who lose their jobs and need benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.