Skip to main content

Van Milligen v. Dept. of Employment SEC.

Ill. App. Ct.May 22, 2007No. 2-06-0098Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Gilleran Johnson
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The trial court's dismissal of the plaintiff's complaint was affirmed because the plaintiff failed to name the Board of Review as a required defendant within the 35-day statutory period mandated by the Illinois Administrative Review Law, and amendment was not permitted.

What This Ruling Means

# Van Milligen v. Department of Employment Summary **What Happened** Van Milligen filed a wrongful termination lawsuit against Bond Drug Company and Walgreens Company after losing his job. To challenge his termination through Illinois's administrative system, he needed to follow specific legal procedures, including naming certain parties as defendants within a strict 35-day deadline. **The Court's Decision** The court sided with the employers. It dismissed Van Milligen's case because he failed to include the Board of Review as a defendant within the required 35-day timeframe. The court refused to allow him to fix this mistake by adding the Board of Review later, and this decision was upheld on appeal. **Why This Matters** This case highlights how important procedural deadlines are in employment disputes. Workers pursuing wrongful termination claims must carefully follow all legal requirements and meet strict filing deadlines. Missing deadlines or failing to name required parties—even by oversight—can result in losing your case entirely. Workers should consult with someone familiar with employment law before filing complaints to ensure they follow proper procedures.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.