Skip to main content

County of Dane v. Labor & Industry Review Commission

WISCTAPPNovember 29, 2007No. 2006AP2695Cited 3 times
Plaintiff WinDane County
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Dykman, Vergeront, Lundsten
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed LIRC's decision granting an injured worker a disfigurement award under worker's compensation law based on her limp, holding that LIRC's interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 102.56(1) was reasonable and entitled to due weight deference.

What This Ruling Means

# County of Dane v. Labor & Industry Review Commission ## What Happened An injured worker employed by Dane County sustained a workplace injury that caused a permanent limp. The worker filed a claim for a disfigurement award—extra compensation for permanent scarring or visible injury—based on this limp. ## What the Court Decided The court sided with the worker and the Labor & Industry Review Commission (LIRC), which had previously approved the disfigurement award. The court upheld LIRC's decision and agreed that a limp qualifies as a compensable disfigurement under Wisconsin law. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling clarifies that visible, permanent injuries affecting how you walk or move can qualify for additional compensation beyond basic medical expenses and lost wages. Workers who suffer lasting physical changes from workplace accidents may be entitled to extra payments to reflect the permanent impact on their appearance and mobility. This case strengthens protections for injured employees seeking fair compensation for lasting workplace injuries.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.