Skip to main content

Pollard v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Pa. Commw. Ct.May 20, 2002Cited 4 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Smith-Ribner, Simpson, Kelley
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed the Board's denial of unemployment benefits, finding that the claimant's voluntary separation due to loss of driver's license (caused by unpaid child support) and vehicle problems did not constitute necessitous and compelling cause under unemployment compensation law.

What This Ruling Means

I cannot provide a complete summary of Pollard v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review because the excerpt you've provided doesn't contain enough information about the case details, court decision, or legal reasoning. From what's available, this appears to be a 2002 Pennsylvania employment law case involving unemployment compensation benefits. The case was heard by the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court and involved a dispute with the state's Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, which handles appeals of unemployment benefit decisions. However, without the actual case excerpt or details about: - What Mr. Pollard's specific situation was - Why his unemployment benefits were denied or disputed - What the court ultimately decided - The reasoning behind the decision I cannot explain what happened in the dispute, what the court ruled, or what this means for workers seeking unemployment benefits. To provide an accurate and helpful summary for workers, I would need the full case details, including the facts of the case and the court's decision and reasoning.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.