McAdam v. United Parcel Service & Helmsman Management Services, Inc.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Wathen, Clifford, Rudman, Dana, Saufley, Alexander, Calkins
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court vacated the hearing officer's decision and remanded for further proceedings on two issues: the apportionment of liability against the subsequent employer (City of Portland) under the correct statutory standard, and recalculation of the average weekly wage by excluding fringe benefits and reconsidering the one-time bonus.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.