Skip to main content

Adams v. LOCKE TRANSP., INC.

Ill.November 1, 2009No. 108917
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Illinois Supreme Court denied the petition for leave to appeal, effectively terminating the plaintiff's appeal.

What This Ruling Means

**Adams v. Locke Transportation, Inc. - Illinois Supreme Court (2009)** This case involved an employment dispute between a worker named Adams and Locke Transportation, Inc., a trucking company. While the specific details of what Adams was claiming against the employer aren't provided in the available information, this was an employment law matter that had already worked its way through lower courts. The Illinois Supreme Court decided not to hear Adams' case by denying his petition for leave to appeal. This meant the case was effectively over, and Adams could not pursue his claims any further through the court system. No damages were awarded to the worker. **What This Means for Workers:** This case shows how challenging it can be for employees to get their disputes heard at the highest court level. State supreme courts are very selective about which cases they review, and most petitions are denied. When a supreme court refuses to hear a case, it doesn't mean the worker was wrong - it just means the court chose not to review that particular dispute. Workers should understand that even if they lose at lower court levels, getting a supreme court to hear their appeal is extremely difficult and unlikely to succeed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.