Skip to main content

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Quad/Graphics, Inc.

E.D. Wis.November 1, 1994No. 94-MISC-42Cited 3 times
Plaintiff WinQuad/Graphics, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Myron L. Gordon
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The court granted the EEOC's application to enforce its administrative subpoena against Quad/Graphics, requiring the company to produce hiring and recruitment information for its four southeastern Wisconsin plants. The court rejected Quad/Graphics' challenges regarding charge validity, bad faith allegations, and undue burden.

What This Ruling Means

# Court Rules EEOC Can Access Quad/Graphics Hiring Records ## What Happened The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), a federal agency that investigates workplace discrimination, sought access to hiring and recruitment records from Quad/Graphics, Inc.'s four plants in southeastern Wisconsin. The EEOC was investigating potential discrimination claims. Quad/Graphics refused to provide the documents, arguing the request was invalid, made in bad faith, and overly burdensome. ## What the Court Decided The court sided with the EEOC and ordered Quad/Graphics to turn over all requested hiring and recruitment information. The court rejected each of the company's objections, finding them without merit. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling strengthens workers' ability to challenge discrimination. It establishes that companies cannot easily block the EEOC's investigations by refusing to produce hiring records. These documents are critical evidence in proving whether employers discriminated against job applicants or employees based on protected characteristics like race, gender, or national origin. Without access to this data, discrimination claims would be nearly impossible to prove.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.