Skip to main content

Miller v. Union Pacific Railroad

Cal. Ct. App.February 1, 2007No. C052300Cited 6 times
Defendant WinUnion Pacific Railroad Company$1,300,000 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Robie
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's order striking the plaintiff's request for approximately $73,000 in expert witness fees, holding that federal law controls the availability of such fees in FELA actions filed in state court, and federal law does not authorize expert witness fee awards to prevailing plaintiffs.

What This Ruling Means

**Miller v. Union Pacific Railroad - Court Ruling Summary** This case involved a railroad worker who sued Union Pacific Railroad for wrongful termination and won $1.3 million in damages. After winning, the worker asked the court to make the railroad company pay an additional $73,000 to cover the costs of expert witnesses who testified during the trial. The court refused to award these extra fees. The judge ruled that even though the case was filed in a state court, federal railroad laws (specifically the Federal Employers Liability Act or FELA) controlled what types of costs the losing company had to pay. Under federal law, winning workers cannot recover expert witness fees from their former employers, even when they win their cases. **What this means for workers:** If you're a railroad employee who wins a lawsuit against your employer, you may still have to pay your own expert witness costs out of your settlement or award money. This is different from some other types of employment cases where winners can get these costs covered. Railroad workers should factor in these potential out-of-pocket expenses when deciding whether to pursue legal action and when calculating the true value of any settlement offers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.