Skip to main content

Maddox v. University of Tennessee

E.D. Tenn.May 31, 1994No. 2:93-cv-00276Cited 5 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Jordan
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to AccommodateDiscrimination

Outcome

The court granted the defendant university's motion for summary judgment, finding no genuine issue of material fact and rejecting the plaintiff's claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation Act. The plaintiff failed to establish that he was qualified for the position or that his disability played a role in the termination decision.

What This Ruling Means

**Maddox v. University of Tennessee (1994)** This case involved a discrimination lawsuit filed by an employee named Maddox against the University of Tennessee. Maddox claimed that the university discriminated against them, though the specific details of the alleged discrimination are not provided in the available information. The federal court in Tennessee's Eastern District dismissed the case in May 1994. This means the court threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money to Maddox. When a court dismisses a case, it typically means either the plaintiff failed to prove their claims, the case lacked legal merit, or there were procedural problems with how the lawsuit was filed. **What This Means for Workers:** This case serves as a reminder that filing a discrimination lawsuit doesn't guarantee success. Courts require solid evidence and proper legal procedures to win employment discrimination cases. Workers who believe they've faced workplace discrimination should document incidents carefully, follow their employer's complaint procedures when possible, and consider consulting with employment attorneys who can evaluate whether their situation meets legal standards for discrimination claims. Simply feeling treated unfairly isn't enough - discrimination claims must meet specific legal requirements to succeed in court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.