Skip to main content

Shelden v. Marin County Employees' Retirement Ass'n

Cal. Ct. App.September 24, 2010No. A124912Cited 15 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Jones
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of the employee's petition for writ of mandate, holding that overtime hours worked on a voluntary arrest warrant service team were not compensable as part of his regularly scheduled working hours for retirement benefit calculation purposes.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Rules Against Officer's Retirement Benefit Claim** A police officer sued the Marin County Employees' Retirement Association because they wouldn't count his overtime hours toward his retirement benefits. The officer had worked extra hours on a voluntary arrest warrant service team and wanted those hours included when calculating his pension benefits. He believed this overtime should count as part of his regular working schedule for retirement purposes. The court sided with the retirement association. Both the original trial court and the appeals court ruled that the overtime hours from the voluntary team could not be counted as regular working hours when determining retirement benefits. The courts found that these extra hours were separate from the officer's normal duties and schedule. This decision matters for workers because it shows that not all overtime or extra work will automatically boost retirement benefits. Voluntary assignments or special duties may not count toward pension calculations, even if you're paid for the time. Workers should check their retirement plan rules carefully to understand exactly which hours and earnings will be included in their benefit calculations. What counts as "regular" work for pension purposes may be more limited than workers expect.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.