Skip to main content

United States v. Electro-Voice, Inc.

INNDFebruary 17, 1995No. 3:94-cv-01037Cited 3 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Miller
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
720 Labor/Management Relations Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
State
Indiana

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

In an NLRB Section 10(j) injunction proceeding, the court granted in part and denied in part the United States' motion to quash subpoenas, protecting the NLRB investigator's reports, internal memoranda, and depositions under work-product and deliberative process privileges, while requiring production of witness affidavits.

What This Ruling Means

# United States v. Electro-Voice, Inc. (1995) ## What Happened The U.S. government brought a legal case against Electro-Voice, Inc., accusing the company of wage theft and violating labor standards. The government claimed the employer failed to properly pay workers or violated rules protecting worker compensation and working conditions. ## What the Court Decided The court dismissed the case in February 1995. No damages were awarded, meaning the company was not required to pay money to workers or the government as a result of this ruling. ## Why This Matters for Workers While the case was dismissed, it shows that the government actively monitors companies suspected of wage theft and labor violations. Workers who believe their employer has improperly withheld pay or violated labor standards should know that federal agencies can investigate these complaints. If you suspect wage theft, you can report it to the Department of Labor or your state's labor agency, even if a previous case was unsuccessful.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.