Skip to main content

Tejada Ex Rel. Tejada v. Rowe

Tex. App.—9th Dist.November 22, 2006No. 09-06-025 CVCited 26 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
McKeithen, Gaultney, Kreger
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The trial court's dismissal of the plaintiff's medical malpractice claims against the individual defendants was affirmed. The court held that under Texas Tort Claims Act § 101.106(f), the claims against government employees Rowe and DeMay could have been brought against their governmental employer UTMB and therefore had to be dismissed as to the individuals.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** A person named Tejada filed a lawsuit claiming medical malpractice against individual employees (Rowe and DeMay) who worked for the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston (UTMB), a government employer. The case also included wrongful termination claims, though the details of those claims aren't specified in the available information. **What the Court Decided** The court dismissed the claims against the individual employees and sided with the defendants. The judge ruled that under Texas law, when someone wants to sue government employees for actions they took as part of their job duties, they must sue the government agency itself (UTMB) rather than the individual workers personally. Since Tejada could have brought the case directly against UTMB as the employer, the claims against the individual employees had to be thrown out. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling shows that government employees in Texas have some protection from personal lawsuits when they're acting within their job responsibilities. If someone has a problem with how a government worker performed their duties, they generally must pursue legal action against the government agency rather than the individual employee personally.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.