Skip to main content

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Wingerter

Md.July 30, 2007No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle AG) No. 71, Sept. Term, 2005Cited 18 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Bell, Raker, Cathell, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene, Wilner
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Attorney Rex B. Wingerter was disbarred by the Maryland Court of Appeals for violating professional conduct rules (Rule 8.4) based on his guilty plea to misprision of a felony involving dishonesty, fraud, and misrepresentation in his work as in-house counsel for an immigration services company.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Attorney Rex B. Wingerter worked as in-house counsel (an employee lawyer) for Global Recruitment and Immigration Services, Inc., an immigration services company. While working there, Wingerter committed serious professional misconduct involving dishonesty, fraud, and misrepresentation. He pleaded guilty to a federal crime called "misprision of a felony," which means he knew about a serious crime but failed to report it to authorities and took steps to cover it up. **What the Court Decided** The Maryland Court of Appeals disbarred Wingerter, meaning he permanently lost his license to practice law. The court found that his guilty plea to the federal crime violated professional conduct rules that require lawyers to maintain honesty and integrity. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that even lawyers who work as employees inside companies must follow strict ethical rules. When in-house attorneys engage in fraud or dishonesty, they face serious consequences including losing their careers. For workers at companies with in-house legal departments, this demonstrates that company lawyers are held to high professional standards and can be severely punished for misconduct that could harm clients or the public.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.