Skip to main content

Karawia v. United States Department of Labor

S.D.N.Y.May 7, 2009No. 08CV5471 (HB)Cited 5 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Baer
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court granted the DOL's motion for summary judgment and denied ISI's motion, upholding the three-year debarment from federal contracting for violations of the McNamara-O'Hara Service Contract Act.

What This Ruling Means

**Karawia v. Department of Labor: Court Upholds Contractor Debarment for Wage Violations** This case involved International Services, Inc. (ISI), a federal contractor that was accused of violating wage laws under the McNamara-O'Hara Service Contract Act. This law requires companies working on federal contracts to pay their workers specific prevailing wages. The Department of Labor investigated ISI and found wage violations, leading to a three-year ban preventing the company from bidding on new federal contracts. ISI challenged this debarment in court, arguing it was unfair or improper. However, the court sided with the Department of Labor, upholding the three-year ban. The judge granted summary judgment in favor of the DOL, meaning the evidence clearly supported the government's position without needing a trial. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that the government will enforce wage laws for federal contractors and impose serious consequences on companies that cheat workers. When contractors violate wage requirements, they can lose the right to work on federal projects for years, which protects workers and honest businesses. It demonstrates that wage theft has real consequences for employers who benefit from taxpayer-funded contracts.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.