Skip to main content

Gray v. Millea

N.D.N.Y.July 31, 1995No. 1:94-cv-00518Cited 6 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
McAVOY
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
720 Labor/Management Relations Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Summary judgment granted in favor of all defendants on plaintiff's tort claims (defamation, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, breach of contract, and prima facie tort). Plaintiff's attorney was sanctioned $21,665.18 for bringing claims without basis in fact or law.

What This Ruling Means

**Gray v. Millea: Wage Theft Case Dismissed** This case involved a worker named Gray who sued their employer, Millea, claiming wage theft. Gray alleged that their employer failed to pay them wages they were legally owed, which is a common workplace dispute where employees claim they didn't receive proper compensation for their work. The federal court in New York's Northern District dismissed Gray's case in July 1995. This means the court threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money to Gray. The court determined that Gray's claims did not meet the legal requirements to proceed, though the specific reasons for dismissal are not detailed in the available information. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights that wage theft claims must meet specific legal standards to succeed in court. Workers who believe they haven't been paid properly should carefully document their hours worked, wages owed, and any communications with their employer about pay issues. Having strong evidence and understanding applicable wage laws is crucial before filing a lawsuit. While this particular case was unsuccessful, workers still have legal protections against wage theft under federal and state labor laws, and many similar cases do result in workers recovering unpaid wages.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.