Skip to main content

ANDREVICH v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review

PAAugust 31, 2011No. 176 WAL (2011)
Defendant Win
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied the petition for allowance of appeal in an unemployment compensation case.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Andrevich filed an appeal against the Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review regarding an unemployment benefits decision. The case involved a dispute over whether Andrevich was entitled to receive unemployment compensation benefits after losing their job. **What the Court Decided** The Pennsylvania court dismissed Andrevich's case in August 2011. This means the court either found that Andrevich's appeal lacked merit, was filed improperly, or that the Unemployment Compensation Board's original decision should stand. No monetary damages were awarded in this case. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights the appeals process available to workers when their unemployment benefits are denied or disputed. While Andrevich was unsuccessful, workers should know they have the right to challenge unemployment compensation decisions through the court system. However, these appeals must be filed correctly and within specific time limits. Workers facing unemployment benefit disputes should consider seeking assistance from employment attorneys or legal aid organizations to understand their rights and properly navigate the appeals process. The dismissal also shows that not all appeals are successful, making it important to have strong grounds before proceeding.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.