Skip to main content

Wimberly v. Illinois Central Railroad

C.D. Ill.June 24, 2002No. 2:01-cv-02203Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
McCUSKEY
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

Employer prevailed on summary judgment in racial discrimination claim under Title VII. Employee failed to establish prima facie case because he did not pass the required knowledge examination for locomotive engineer certification, which was a legitimate job requirement under FRA regulations.

What This Ruling Means

**Wimberly v. Illinois Central Railroad - Plain English Summary** This case involved a discrimination lawsuit filed by an employee named Wimberly against Illinois Central Railroad in 2002. Wimberly claimed that the railroad company discriminated against them, though the specific details of the alleged discrimination are not provided in the available case information. The federal court in Illinois dismissed Wimberly's case, meaning the lawsuit was thrown out and did not proceed to trial. The court found that Wimberly had not presented sufficient evidence or legal grounds to support their discrimination claims against the railroad company. No monetary damages were awarded since the case was dismissed. **What This Means for Workers:** This case illustrates the challenges workers face when pursuing discrimination claims against large employers like railroad companies. To succeed in discrimination lawsuits, employees must present strong evidence and meet specific legal requirements. Simply alleging discrimination is not enough - workers need documentation, witness testimony, or other concrete proof to support their claims. This case serves as a reminder that workers should carefully document any incidents of potential discrimination and consider consulting with employment attorneys before filing lawsuits to ensure they have a viable case.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.