Skip to main content

Burrows v. Union Pacific Railroad

Mo. Ct. App.January 23, 2007No. ED 87314Cited 19 times
Plaintiff WinUnion Pacific Railroad Company$5,000,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Gary M. Gaertner
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

Jury verdict for plaintiff awarding $5 million in damages for personal injuries sustained when struck by Amtrak train. Defendants' appeals of trial court's denial of motion for new trial and remittitur were denied.

What This Ruling Means

**Burrows v. Union Pacific Railroad: $5 Million Verdict for Injured Worker** This case involved a Union Pacific Railroad employee who was struck by an Amtrak train while working, resulting in serious personal injuries. The worker sued Union Pacific for negligence and wrongful termination, claiming the company failed to provide a safe workplace and improperly fired him. A jury sided with the employee and awarded him $5 million in damages. Union Pacific appealed the decision, asking for a new trial and requesting the court reduce the damage award. However, the appeals court rejected both requests, upholding the full $5 million verdict. This ruling matters for workers because it demonstrates that employers have a legal duty to maintain safe working conditions, especially in high-risk industries like railroads. When companies fail to protect their employees and someone gets hurt, they can be held financially responsible for significant damages. The court's refusal to reduce the award also shows that substantial compensation is appropriate when workplace negligence leads to serious injuries. Workers in dangerous jobs should know they have legal protections, and employers cannot simply terminate employees who raise safety concerns or suffer workplace injuries.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.