Skip to main content

Conway v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.

E.D.N.Y.November 7, 2002No. 96 CV 6219 (NG RML)Cited 20 times
SettlementBrooklyn Union Gas Company$40,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Gershon, Levy
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationWrongful Termination

Outcome

The court enforced an oral settlement agreement between plaintiff Conway and Brooklyn Union Gas Co., whereby the company agreed to convert her termination to a resignation, provide a neutral reference, pay $40,000, and plaintiff agreed to withdraw all lawsuits. The court denied defendant's requests for an injunction against future lawsuits and attorney's fees.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Conway, an employee at Brooklyn Union Gas Company, filed a lawsuit claiming she faced discrimination and was wrongfully terminated from her job. The case centered around whether her employment ended fairly and legally. **What the Court Decided** Rather than going to trial, both sides reached a settlement agreement that the court enforced. Under this settlement, Brooklyn Union Gas agreed to several terms: they would change Conway's termination to a resignation on her employment record, provide only neutral references if contacted by future employers, and pay her $40,000. In return, Conway agreed to drop all her lawsuits against the company. The court rejected the company's request to prevent Conway from filing future lawsuits and also denied their request to make Conway pay their attorney's fees. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that employees can successfully challenge unfair treatment at work, even when facing large companies. Settlement agreements can provide meaningful compensation and help protect a worker's reputation through neutral references. However, the specifics of each settlement depend on the individual case, and outcomes can vary significantly.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.