Skip to main content

Carswell v. Raytheon Employees Disability Trust

E.D. Tenn.April 3, 2001No. 2:00-cv-00282
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Hull
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
863 D.I.W.C. / D.I.W.W.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court granted the plan administrator's motion for judgment on the administrative record and dismissed the plaintiff's ERISA challenge to termination of long-term disability benefits, finding the administrator acted rationally in determining the plaintiff was no longer totally disabled under the plan definition.

What This Ruling Means

**Carswell v. Raytheon Employees Disability Trust** This case involved a worker who was receiving long-term disability benefits through their employer's benefit plan. The employee, Carswell, had been getting these payments but the plan administrator (the company that manages the benefits) decided to stop them. The administrator determined that Carswell was no longer "totally disabled" according to the plan's rules and therefore no longer qualified for benefits. Carswell disagreed and sued, arguing this decision was wrong. The court sided with the plan administrator. The judge found that the administrator had acted reasonably when they reviewed Carswell's case and decided to terminate the benefits. The court determined that the administrator properly followed the plan's definition of "total disability" and made a rational decision based on the available evidence. **What this means for workers:** This ruling highlights how much power benefit plan administrators have when making decisions about disability claims. If you're receiving or applying for disability benefits through work, understand that these administrators have significant discretion in interpreting plan rules. To protect yourself, keep detailed medical records and understand your plan's specific requirements for continuing benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.