Skip to main content

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.

W.D. Tenn.February 19, 1991No. 87-2888-TUBCited 4 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Turner
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The court granted the defendant employer's motion for summary judgment, holding that the EEOC's discrimination charge was filed outside the statutory 300-day limitations period and therefore time-barred, as the formal charge was not received by the EEOC until day 301 after the alleged discriminatory termination.

What This Ruling Means

# EEOC v. Dillard Department Stores **What Happened** The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), a federal agency that protects workers from unfair treatment, filed a lawsuit against Dillard Department Stores. The case involved claims that the company discriminated against employees based on protected characteristics like race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. **What the Court Decided** Rather than go to trial, Dillard and the EEOC reached a settlement agreement in February 1991. This meant both sides negotiated and agreed to resolve the dispute without a judge making a final ruling. The specific terms and damages were not publicly reported in detail. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case demonstrates that employers can be held accountable for discriminatory hiring and employment practices. When workers believe they've faced discrimination, the EEOC can investigate and pursue legal action on their behalf. Settlements like this one encourage companies to take discrimination complaints seriously and make changes to prevent future problems in the workplace.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.