Skip to main content

Vasquez v. Coast Valley Roofing, Inc.

E.D. Cal.November 17, 2009No. 2:07-cr-00227Cited 19 times
SettlementCoast Valley Roofing, Inc.$300,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Citation
670 F. Supp. 2d 1114, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106973, 2009 WL 3857428
Judge(s)
Oliver W. Wanger
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftWrongful Termination

Outcome

Court granted preliminary approval of a $300,000 class action settlement in a wage-and-hour case involving approximately 150 roofing workers. The settlement covers unpaid overtime, minimum wages, meal periods, rest breaks, and related penalties.

What This Ruling Means

**Vasquez v. Coast Valley Roofing: Employment Discrimination Case** This case involved employment discrimination claims brought by a worker named Vasquez against Coast Valley Roofing, Inc. The specific details of the discrimination allegations are not provided in the available information, but the case dealt with workplace treatment issues that Vasquez believed violated employment laws. The court reached a mixed decision, meaning Vasquez won on some issues but not others. The court found some merit in certain aspects of the discrimination claims against Coast Valley Roofing, but the company was not held liable on all counts. No monetary damages were awarded to Vasquez, suggesting that while some wrongdoing may have been acknowledged, it either wasn't severe enough to warrant financial compensation or the worker couldn't prove sufficient harm. **What This Means for Workers:** This case demonstrates that employment discrimination claims can be complex, with courts carefully weighing each aspect of a worker's complaints. Even when some discrimination is found, workers may not automatically receive monetary compensation. For employees facing workplace discrimination, this highlights the importance of documenting incidents thoroughly and understanding that legal victories can be partial rather than complete.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.