Skip to main content

Sasannejad v. University of Rochester

W.D.N.Y.August 10, 2004No. 6:02-cv-06642Cited 8 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Larimer
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The University of Rochester prevailed on summary judgment. The court found that the plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence that the University's stated nondiscriminatory reasons for his December 2001 termination (poor job performance) were pretextual, and that he was not terminated because of his Iranian national origin or Muslim religion.

What This Ruling Means

**Sasannejad v. University of Rochester: Employment Discrimination Case Dismissed** This case involved an employee named Sasannejad who filed a discrimination lawsuit against the University of Rochester. The worker claimed they faced discriminatory treatment during their employment at the university, though the specific details of the alleged discrimination are not provided in the available case information. The federal court in the Western District of New York dismissed the case in August 2004. This means the court threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money damages to the employee. When a court dismisses a case, it typically means either the worker failed to prove their claims, didn't follow proper legal procedures, or the allegations didn't meet the legal standards required for a discrimination case. For workers, this case serves as a reminder that winning discrimination lawsuits requires strong evidence and following specific legal requirements. Simply feeling mistreated at work isn't enough - employees must be able to prove they were discriminated against based on protected characteristics like race, gender, age, or disability. Workers considering discrimination claims should document incidents carefully and consult with employment attorneys to understand whether their situation meets legal standards before filing a lawsuit.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.