Skip to main content

Teamsters & Employers Welfare Trust v. Gorman Bros. Ready Mix

C.D. Ill.April 17, 2001No. 99-3059Cited 4 times
Plaintiff WinGorman Brothers Ready Mix$203,318.27 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Richard Mills
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
bench trial

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court awarded the Trust Fund $151,965.70 in delinquent ERISA contributions plus liquidated damages, interest, audit fees, and attorney's fees, rejecting the employer's affirmative defenses of fraud, unjust enrichment, equitable estoppel, and laches.

What This Ruling Means

This case involved a dispute between a union benefits trust fund and Gorman Brothers Ready Mix, a concrete company, over unpaid employee benefit contributions. **What Happened** The Teamsters & Employers Welfare Trust sued Gorman Brothers Ready Mix for failing to pay required contributions to employee benefit funds. Under federal law (ERISA), employers must make these payments to provide health insurance, pensions, and other benefits to their workers. Gorman Brothers owed $151,965.70 in unpaid contributions and tried to defend itself by claiming the trust fund had committed fraud and other wrongdoing. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled in favor of the trust fund and ordered Gorman Brothers to pay $203,318.27 total. This included the original unpaid contributions plus additional penalties, interest, audit costs, and attorney's fees. The court rejected all of the company's defenses. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling strengthens protections for employee benefits. When employers promise to contribute to benefit funds as part of union contracts, they cannot simply stop paying and avoid consequences. Courts will enforce these obligations and make employers pay penalties on top of what they already owed, helping ensure workers receive the benefits they've earned.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.