Skip to main content

Connor v. Ulrich

E.D.N.Y.July 23, 2001No. 9:99-cv-02541Cited 6 times
Plaintiff WinNassau County Police Department$210,750 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Spatt
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil rights other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Plaintiff Harold Connor prevailed on his Section 1983 excessive force claim against Police Officer Henry Ulrich, obtaining a jury verdict awarding $210,750 in compensatory damages and $1.00 in punitive damages. The court subsequently awarded attorney's fees of $31,752.62.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Harold Connor, who worked for the Nassau County Police Department, sued Police Officer Henry Ulrich for using excessive force against him and violating his constitutional rights. Connor claimed that Ulrich used unreasonable physical force during an incident, which harmed him both physically and emotionally. **What the Court Decided** A jury ruled in Connor's favor, finding that Officer Ulrich did use excessive force and violated Connor's constitutional rights. The court awarded Connor $210,750 in compensatory damages to cover his injuries and suffering, plus $1 in punitive damages. Additionally, the court ordered that Connor receive $31,752.62 to cover his attorney's fees, meaning he didn't have to pay his own legal costs for the lawsuit. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that workers have legal protection against excessive force, even when it comes from law enforcement officers they work with. When someone's constitutional rights are violated at work, they can seek compensation through federal civil rights laws. The fact that the court also awarded attorney's fees is significant because it means workers who win these cases can get their legal costs covered, making it more realistic to pursue justice when their rights are violated.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.