Skip to main content

Greer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Pa. Commw. Ct.July 29, 2010Cited 17 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Pellegrini, Brobson, McCullough
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review's decision that the claimant was ineligible for unemployment benefits after being terminated for violating the employer's substance abuse policy by testing positive for cocaine.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** A worker named Greer was fired from Lehigh Heavy Forge Corporation after failing a drug test that showed cocaine in his system. This violated the company's substance abuse policy. After being terminated, Greer applied for unemployment benefits but was denied by Pennsylvania's unemployment office. He challenged this decision, arguing he should receive benefits. **What the Court Decided** The court sided with the unemployment office and upheld the denial of benefits. The judges agreed that Greer was not eligible for unemployment compensation because he was fired for violating his employer's drug policy. The court found that testing positive for cocaine constituted misconduct that disqualified him from receiving benefits. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling reinforces that workers who are fired for drug policy violations typically cannot collect unemployment benefits. If you're terminated for failing a company drug test, you'll likely be denied unemployment compensation because it's considered misconduct. Workers should understand that workplace substance abuse policies have serious consequences beyond just losing your job – you may also lose access to the financial safety net that unemployment benefits provide while searching for new employment.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.