Skip to main content

Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

5th CircuitJune 19, 2001No. 00-60334Cited 22 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Garza, Davis, Jones
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Outcome

The Fifth Circuit reversed the NLRB's decision and granted Entergy's petition for review, holding that operations coordinators are statutory supervisors under the NLRA and therefore not covered by the bargaining unit. The court refused to defer to the Board's changed position since the underlying facts and law had not materially changed since the Board's 1983 supervisor determination.

What This Ruling Means

**What happened:** Entergy Gulf States, a utility company, disagreed with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) about whether certain employees called "operations coordinators" should be allowed to join a union. The company argued these workers were supervisors who manage other employees, while the NLRB said they were regular workers who could be part of the union's bargaining group. **What the court decided:** The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with Entergy. The court ruled that operations coordinators are indeed supervisors under federal labor law, which means they cannot join the union or be part of collective bargaining. The court rejected the NLRB's attempt to change its earlier 1983 decision that had classified these same positions as supervisory roles, saying there wasn't enough reason to justify reversing that earlier ruling. **Why this matters for workers:** This decision shows how job titles and duties can affect workers' rights to organize. Employees classified as "supervisors" lose their legal protection to join unions and engage in collective bargaining. Workers should understand that having any supervisory responsibilities—even limited ones—might prevent them from union membership, depending on how courts interpret their specific job duties.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.