Skip to main content

Moore v. Schlesinger

M.D. Fla.June 21, 2001No. 3:01-cv-00108Cited 5 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Presnell
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil rights other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Florida

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court granted defendants' motion to dismiss on grounds of absolute immunity, finding that assistant U.S. attorneys defending the government in civil litigation are entitled to absolute immunity from damages claims for conduct closely associated with the judicial process.

What This Ruling Means

**Moore v. Schlesinger: Court Protects Government Lawyers from Employee Lawsuits** This case involved a federal employee who sued the U.S. government and its attorneys, claiming civil rights violations, racketeering, conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and witness tampering. The employee appears to have alleged that government lawyers engaged in misconduct while defending the government in court proceedings. The court dismissed the entire lawsuit. The judge ruled that assistant U.S. attorneys have "absolute immunity" when they're defending the government in civil court cases. This means these lawyers cannot be sued for damages for actions they take that are closely connected to court proceedings, even if someone claims those actions were wrong or harmful. **What this means for workers:** This ruling makes it very difficult for government employees to successfully sue federal prosecutors and government attorneys who represent the government in employment disputes. If you're a federal worker who believes government lawyers acted improperly while defending against your lawsuit, you likely cannot seek money damages from those attorneys personally. However, this doesn't prevent you from pursuing claims against the government itself as an employer. The protection only applies to the individual lawyers' actions during litigation, not to underlying employment violations by the government agency.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.