Skip to main content

Locals 302 & 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers Construction Industry Health & Security Fund v. Gill

W.D. Wash.August 9, 2010No. Case 09-cv-1779-JPD
Plaintiff WinNelson E. Gill$3,520.04 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
James P. Donohue
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment, compelling defendant Nelson Gill to furnish outstanding payroll documents and records to the Trust Funds' auditors and awarding attorney's fees and costs to plaintiffs.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Health Fund Wins Fight for Payroll Records** This case involved a dispute between union health and security funds and contractor Nelson Gill over missing payroll documents. The union funds needed these records to conduct an audit and ensure that Gill was properly contributing to worker benefit programs as required. When Gill failed to provide the necessary payroll documents and records, the union funds took him to court. The court sided with the union funds, ordering Gill to hand over all outstanding payroll documents and records to the funds' auditors. The judge also required Gill to pay $3,520.04 in attorney's fees and costs to cover the union's legal expenses for having to go to court. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This ruling reinforces that employers cannot simply ignore their obligation to provide payroll records when union benefit funds need them for audits. These audits are crucial for protecting workers because they ensure employers are making required contributions to health insurance, pension, and other benefit programs. When employers try to hide or withhold payroll information, it can signal they may not be paying into worker benefit funds as required. This decision helps protect workers' benefits by making sure union funds can properly monitor employer contributions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.