Skip to main content

Adams v. TENNECO AUTOMOTIVE OPERATING CO., INC.

D. Neb.March 22, 2005No. 4:04 CV 3208
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Kopf
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

The court granted the defendant's Rule 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law on the plaintiff's marital status discrimination claims, finding no legally sufficient evidentiary basis for the discrimination claim and ruling that Nebraska law defines 'marital status' narrowly as only 'married' or 'single,' not including separated or divorced status.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.