Skip to main content

Perry v. Cobb County Bd. of Elections and Registration

N.D. Ga.November 18, 2003No. 1:02-cv-01206
SettlementCobb County Board of Elections and Registration
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Carnes
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
443 Civil rights accomodations
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree
State
Georgia

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The court approved a consent order establishing a redistricting plan for Cobb County Board of Commissioners that was previously drawn by the court, to remain in effect until the 2010 census reapportionment or new preclearance legislation, with each party bearing its own costs.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved a discrimination claim against the Cobb County Board of Elections and Registration in Georgia. The dispute centered around how voting districts were drawn for the Cobb County Board of Commissioners. The plaintiffs argued that the way these districts were created was discriminatory. **What the Court Decided** Rather than going to trial, both sides reached a settlement agreement. The court approved this settlement, which established a specific redistricting plan for the Cobb County Board of Commissioners. This plan had actually been drawn by the court in an earlier proceeding. The settlement stated that this redistricting plan would stay in place until either the 2010 census led to new district maps or new federal voting rights legislation was passed. Each side agreed to pay their own legal costs. **Why This Matters for Workers** While this case dealt specifically with voting districts rather than workplace discrimination, it shows how discrimination cases can be resolved through court-approved settlements. For workers, this demonstrates that discrimination claims can sometimes be settled without lengthy trials, and that courts will oversee agreements to ensure they address the underlying discrimination concerns properly.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.