Skip to main content

St. Clair Shores General Employees Retirement System v. Eibeler

S.D.N.Y.September 8, 2010No. 06 Civ. 688(RJS)Cited 12 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Richard J. Sullivan
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss all remaining disclosure violation claims (Counts VII through XI) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, finding that Plaintiff failed to allege damages sufficient to support recovery under Delaware law.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** The St. Clair Shores General Employees Retirement System sued Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. for allegedly failing to properly disclose important information. The retirement system claimed the company broke its contract by not sharing required details that could have affected business decisions. **What the Court Decided:** The court dismissed the case entirely. The judge ruled that the retirement system failed to show they suffered actual financial harm from the alleged lack of disclosure. Under Delaware law, you must prove you lost money or suffered damages to win this type of case. Since the retirement system couldn't demonstrate specific losses, the court threw out their claims. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This ruling shows that in disclosure violation cases, it's not enough to prove a company failed to share information – you must also prove that failure actually cost you money. For workers and pension funds investing in companies, this means they need strong evidence of financial losses to successfully challenge companies over missing or inadequate disclosures. Simply showing poor communication or incomplete information won't be sufficient to win in court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.